The Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument encompasses a vast area larger than all U.S. national parks combined.
We came here to map the seafloor around the islands, atolls, reefs, and seamounts that compose the Northwestern Hawaiian Island chain within the monument. Ultimately, we want to gain a better understanding of the geological processes that helped shape this part of the world.
As the ship cruises along at around 10 knots, we operate three different data collection systems. First, we have Falkor’s multibeam sonar
When oceanic crust forms in the fiery furnace of a volcanic mid-ocean ridge, its rocks contain tiny iron atoms that align themselves with the local magnetic field. As the rock cools to a solid, these atoms freeze in place, preserving a record of the direction and intensity of the magnetic field at that time. That field tends to fade over time, so the intensity of the signals we measure is one indicator of age.
But, as it happens, the Earth’s outer core is a dynamic place, and this causes the north and south magnet poles to reverse every few hundred thousand years. That history is now well established, so the direction of the magnetic field we detect at a given spot gives us another age indicator.
When Navy ships combed the oceans with magnetometers in the 1950s looking for ways to detect submarines, they unexpectedly discovered alternating bands of magnetizations in the seafloor, which was one of the strongest pieces of evidence that gave birth to the theory of plate tectonics.
Reading the Hawaiian Islands
Now that we know the plates move, we think we have a good idea how the Hawaiian Island chain formed. As described in our previous post about Midway Island, motion of the Pacific Plate over the Hawaiian hotspot results in a chain of islands that progressively sink to a fate as submarine mountains called seamounts. These Hawaiian seamounts coexist with other, older seamounts that pepper the bottom of the ocean.
How can we tell them apart? Remember that when volcanic rocks solidify, they lock in the magnetic field of the time and place where they form. That means that we can tell at what latitude rocks formed based on their magnetic signature. Plus, the minerals within the rock alter over time, and the little iron atoms lose their alignment. So, as mentioned, the intensity of magnetization within the rock decreases as a result. Thus, we would expect to see lower magnetic anomalies with our magnetometer when we pass over older, non-Hawaiian seamounts compared with the younger Hawaiian ones. The seafloor in this area is Cretaceous in age about 80-100 million years old, so we’re trying to use magnetic data to discriminate between Cretaceous vs. Hawaiian seamounts, which are only about 5-45 million years old.
As a geophysicist with mostly a seismology background, I am excited by this hands-on opportunity to learn about marine magnetics. I hope to fold this into my dissertation involving other geophysical exploration methods on the Earth and planets. Mahalo nui loa to everyone on the R/V Falkor team for a superb cruise so far.